Category talk:English two-letter words
Latest comment: 10 years ago by -sche in topic RFM
RFM[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
- Discussion moved from WT:RFDO#Category:English two-letter words.
Use this instead: Category:English two-letter terms. --Daniel. 20:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- There are quite a few categories that should really use "terms" instead of "words". This was going to be fixed by User:JackBot but the bot vote failed. --Yair rand 21:03, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, two letter terms would allow abbreviations, initialisms and acronyms as well, so that would be an entirely different category. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Exactly. Why would we want a "two-letter" category that excludes B.E. and others by definition? --Daniel. 21:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, two letter terms would allow abbreviations, initialisms and acronyms as well, so that would be an entirely different category. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- For Scrabble maybe? - [The]DaveRoss 23:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- How B.E. in that category would be against the goal of playing Scrabble? --Daniel. 16:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- For Scrabble maybe? - [The]DaveRoss 23:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- FWIW we want two letters, not two characters right? So 2¢ isn't allowed because it has two characters, but no letters. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- I like how Category:English two-character terms sounds. --Daniel. 15:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- This discussion is very stale; I am archiving it as 'no action taken at this time'. Relist if you wish. - -sche (discuss) 06:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)