Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/yugóm

is the genitive really /-osyo/?

Or is this a mistake copied from the masculine? This is the only noun in its class with /-om/ so there is no other place to post this.—Soap— 06:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

I suppose nobody REALLY knows .... it may come down to whether -osyo is the thematic /o/ followed by /-syo/, or a fused suffix /-os/ followed by demonstrative /-yo/ (my personal theory, not that it means much). What I really want to know is whether the /osyo/ appears here on purpose, be it right or wrong, or whether it was just overlooked when copying from the masculine. —Soap— 07:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

In o-stem nouns, masculine and neuter have the same case forms except in the nominative, vocative and accusative. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 05:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)