Talk:𪜁
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic 𪜁
Deletion discussion[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Definition:
- This character does not exist
Chuck Entz (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Is there a place where this information can be placed instead that can easily be found by readers? (it seems like this "nonexistent" claim is even sourced—I bet no other character-centric website can currently say the same) —suzukaze (t・c) 02:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- We could
{{no entry}}-ify it like this. Let's do that rather than delete it altogether. - -sche (discuss) 03:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)- That might be a good idea. I thought about just speedying it, but it was far enough from what we normally deal with that I felt I should get some other opinions- so I brought it here. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- It seems to me this character does exist (!) however if it's not used in any human languages there's no reason to keep it. Being present in a couple of databases isn't enough. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- That might be a good idea. I thought about just speedying it, but it was far enough from what we normally deal with that I felt I should get some other opinions- so I brought it here. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- We could
- This reminds me of Category:Ghost kanji, although in the RFD discussion there it was brought up that the entries in that category were unsourceable rather than uncitable. Nibiko (talk) 21:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Do you look in GZJW = Yinzhou Jinwen Jicheng Yinde (殷周金文集成引得) yet? When it is sourced, so it is/was used. Looks like kinda ancient form. (I could say every CJK character are sourced so Unicode implemented it.) --Octahedron80 (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Resolved as a
{{no entry}}(-sche's diff, linked above). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)