Talk:Googlenope
RFV[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Journalist's invention. Nothing in Google Books and only one result on Usenet. Equinox ◑ 14:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- In Usenet terminology a nope was the opposite of a dupe: A dupe is an article arriving more than once, and a nope is an article arriving less than once (IOW it didn't arrive). If the Googlenope didn't make it into common use it was at least a good try, no patent nonsense. Of course good try wouldn't be the same as encyclopedic (or whatever wikt: considers as notable). –89.204.137.194 04:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- I added it to WT:LOP. In the event it is cited and RFV-passed, it should be removed from the LOP. - -sche (discuss) 05:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I created the entry, since I use this word and hear other people do. I like to add a link in online discussions for those that do not know it. --Jarekt 12:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 05:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)