Talk:Ton
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Fytcha in topic RFV discussion: November 2021–January 2022
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Removed by IP out of process in Special:Diff/64669014 with the summary "Does not exist!" — surjection ⟨??⟩ 14:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's from diff, from diff. Because of the High German consonant shift, the term or at least etymology seem indeed very dubious.
- From the same user: diff & Gaas. --Myrelia (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's at least archaic (note also that they provided the genitive, which - outside of fixed expressions and names - occurs in very few dialects overall and in none in Bern). For comparison, the standard High Alemannic word is /t͡sɑː(n)/ with /t͡sɔː(n)/ being a possibility in some dialects (including some Highest Alemannic). The first consonant seems weird though.
- See also these edits (diff, diff) by @Linshee, though she might just have copied over the information found in Ton. --Fytcha (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- I still got nothing. Asked somebody from Bern, they had no idea either. Not in my common sources either.
- @Widsith: Any source perchance? — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 04:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not in any of my dictionaries. And round here, everyone says Zaa. Ƿidsiþ 07:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
RFV-failed. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 12:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)