Talk:bleeded
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Widsith in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion
[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
We clearly should not have this nonword that Justin Timberlake annoyingly used in one of his songs. Jooge 23:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- There are plenty of google books hits. The entry should end up looking something like hurted. Kappa 02:37, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Like hurted, bleeded used to be perfectly standard. Though I'm sure Timberlake didn't know that. Widsith 17:41, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm just bleating, but when you do a news search, you get 0 hits, asked if you mean "bleeds", which then returns over 500. Bled returns over 1300. Books returns 107 since 1970 (at least the first page appears to be artistic attempts to capture child-speak), but bled returns 4980. It definitely needs to be stamped as nonce/non-standard/archaic and incorrect usage.--Halliburton Shill 03:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
It's marked as obsolete or non-standard which seems to cover it. Let's consider this one dealt with. Widsith 11:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)