Talk:center of excellence
Okay, so I'm just an anon peon newb, but this isn't very dictionary-like, is it? It looks like a glossary entry for a business fad-word, rather than a definition. There is no neologism here, and the words together do not convey much more than their expected combined meaning. I recommend deletion. 165.125.144.16 14:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think verifying it is a better first step, but yes I can see your point. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Seems a bit encyclopedic, but still I think it meets CFI if it's a genuine field-specific business term. Otherwise it's more of a center of excellence, isn't it? Mglovesfun (talk) 14:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- RFV failed, entry deleted. —RuakhTALK 20:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)