Talk:combattre le feu par le feu

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: January–February 2017
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: January–February 2017[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This has been created by tbot from the translation table; the translation itself was added par @Lmaltier, but I don't know why he did that; this looks like a calque of fight fire with fire, while the real idiom is combattre le mal par le mal or soigner le mal par le mal. The French Wiktionary doesn't even have it. I agree there are a lot of hits on Google, though. --Barytonesis (talk) 19:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, both exist: 26000 hits on Google for combattre le feu par le feu, 34000 for combattre le mal par le mal. The French Wiktionary isn't complete (of course), and both are absent, but they will be added sometime or another. Lmaltier (talk) 19:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Keep, as has been pointed out it exists, a calque though it may be. If you dispute the fact that it exists, take it to WT:RFV. If you think it should be noted that combattre le mal par le mal is another usage (that isn't a calque), feel free to create that entry and link to it as a synonym. Wiktionary doesn't delete forms that are not per se standard usage, as long as they are in use in their language - as combattre le feu par le feu obviously is. — Kleio (t · c) 20:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Note that, in French, I think that the origin is with forest fires. A calque of fight fire with fire is not quite impossible, but I would be surprised. In any case, we should consider that fight fire with fire is not a calque of combattre le feu par le feu. Lmaltier (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Keep (and for future reference, this is a matter for RFV). Andrew Sheedy (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply