Talk:cream in one's jeans

RFD discussion: July 2019–April 2020

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

cream in one's jeans

SOP. 2600:1000:B15C:5C0C:5459:6738:C41:65ED 17:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Keep - It is idiomatic as you don't have to be wearing jeans to cream in your jeans. - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 08:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Is this expression definitely used over a more generic version such as e.g. "cream in one's pants" when it is known that the person is not wearing jeans? Mihia (talk) 23:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Keep, seems like the cream needn't be deposited into jeans for one to cream in one's jeans. Which I suppose is explained by the assonance and by the fact that it sounds funnier than cream in one's pants. Also, one of the quotes provided has a woman creaming her jeans, which (unless the woman in question is pre-op trans) suggests that the cream here is not to be taken literally, further supporting the entry. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 19:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

cream specifically mentions that it is applied to both genders, so that's nothing specific to this definition. I lean a bit against keeping this, but not that strongly.--Prosfilaes (talk) 05:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Delete, SOP with the sense covered at cream. Other variants are also used (even if not as frequently). - TheDaveRoss 12:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

I think the problem here is that the first def (to ejaculate while wearing one's trousers) is SOP, and the second def (to be thoroughly excited or delighted) is idiomatic. So, what I mean to vote is: keep idiomatic def, delete non-idiomatic one - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 08:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Kept - TheDaveRoss 16:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)