Talk:criminal religious movement

RFD discussion: February–April 2024

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

criminal religious movement

Sum of parts (extremely rare too). Equinox ◑ 12:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

@Equinox: Couldn't we wait for the number of academic and other literary works that have the term in their lines or pages to grow? --Apisite (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

If it is sum of parts then the number of uses doesn't matter. Your existing single citation is a mention, not a use. Equinox ◑ 20:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

• Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Delete. Not enough information to recognize idiomatic nature or even extrapolate its being grown by wumaos. Basically this is paranoia, Apisite cannot convince me that there is a conspiracy to push this terminology, although I am all into McCarthyism. Fay Freak (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Delete, SOP. PUC – 11:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Deleted. PUC – 13:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)