Talk:endo
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: "a labor contracting system where workers are hired by employment agencies to work within a specific period of time before being replaced and barred from being re-hired". Philippine English neologism that need cites from any news sources from around 2016 (when the term surfaced). Google Books does give one result providing its usage, but is too sparse.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 23:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Sense: "labor contracting system"[edit]
@Kiwima I have reverted your edit last May on the sense of "(Philiplabor contracting system" for having failed verification, since I'm able to find one news source that uses that sense. Maybe next time you should read carefully any verification request just before you say it fails so; a little research for news articles that mention it should have helped than just saying "RFV-failed" because you (or anybody monitoring the RFV page) don't have time to find any useful cites for the word in question. Thanks. --TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- @TagaSanPedroAko: RFV is a process, and a month is given for people to provide supporting citations. Providing one is not sufficient. You still need two more. If you provide those two more, I will happily reinstate the definition. Kiwima (talk) 23:19, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- I see, and to add up to the first one I found, here is another article of the same topic that mentions the term . --TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 23:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- And I found a third to finish the verification process. I already reinstated the sense since I found the second quote.--TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 23:48, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- I see, and to add up to the first one I found, here is another article of the same topic that mentions the term . --TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 23:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)