Talk:espèce de
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic espèce de
Deletion debate[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Bad entry title. espèce + de covers this nicely. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:44, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Currently, espèce doesn't cover this case at all. It could, of course, but this entry seems useful to me for the very special sense it defines. Lmaltier 08:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes this definition is always used with de, and you can pluralize it. So it's a question of whether to move to espèce and put (pejorative, used with de). Mglovesfun (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like a good entry for Category:French non-constituents. DCDuring TALK 12:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Kept (no consensus) although I don't think our definition is right. Also categorized as DCDuring suggests. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like a good entry for Category:French non-constituents. DCDuring TALK 12:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes this definition is always used with de, and you can pluralize it. So it's a question of whether to move to espèce and put (pejorative, used with de). Mglovesfun (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)