Talk:framework
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
- “6. (literally) The identification and categorisation of processes or steps that constitute a complex task or mindset in order to render explicit the tacit and implicit.”
This sense is obviously not a literal sense, but apart from that, and inasmuch as sense can be made of this gobbledygook, can it be attested in a way that sets it apart from sense 4 (“a basic conceptual structure”)? --Lambiam 21:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 01:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Computing sense: clarification[edit]
In my experience there is difference between a library (traditional) and a framework (modern). A library offers facilities that your program can use (typically function calls), while a framework forces your program to hook into certain events, etc. and respond to them, to fit what the framework wants. (You can tell that I dislike frameworks.) But there is a difference. See also inversion of control. Equinox ◑ 23:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)