Talk:glëmza

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 10 years ago by -sche in topic RFV
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Archaic and regional, not widely used. Maro 18:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

So, you're confident this exists? Mglovesfun (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Can be found in some dictionaries from 19th c., but I don't know if it's Polish or Kashubian. Maro 18:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Two hundred years ago Kashubian was considered as a Polish dialect so this word was in "Polish" dictionaries. Maro 18:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Do you think it's definitely citable in a language (just not necessarily Polish)? Mglovesfun (talk) 11:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
It's in the Słownik Etymologiczny Kaszubszczyzny, volume 2 →ISBN, so it appears to meet the CFI to which Kashubian words are subject (one durably-archived reference mentions it as a Kashubian word). A number of durably-archived references, including dictionaries of Polish, mention it as a Polish word, too, but (as Maro says) they date from an era when Kashubian was considered Polish. (They're also not uses, so it's unclear whether or not this can meet CFI as a Polish word after all.) I created this entry and the following one; would anyone object to me changing their L2s to ==Kashubian==? - -sche (discuss) 21:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have changed the entry accordingly. - -sche (discuss) 21:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Archaic and regional, not widely used. Maro 18:17, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have changed the entry as I suggested in the discussion of glomza (currently at WT:RFV#glomza, later to be archived to Talk:glomza or WT:RFVA). - -sche (discuss) 21:29, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply