Talk:hyperactive battlefield
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Links to a blog and another non-lexical website as references, but no viewable hits on Google Books. Chuck Entz (talk) 12:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 23:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
warfare including high-speed information technology, artificial intelligence, long-range sensors, stealth, precision-guided munitions and the sensor to shooter decision cycle.
No matter how many words one adds it still seems like hyperactive + battlefield to me. DCDuring (talk) 21:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. "Hyperactive" is defined as "having an increased state of activity", but an old mediaeval horses-and-arrows battlefield in a state of high activity would not be the "hyperactive battlefield" defined here. Equinox ◑ 21:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I expanded the definition in an effort to make it clearer: "Warfare involving advanced technologies that expand military engagement beyond the physical battlefield, such as ...". Seems to be more than SOP. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- What is a good
{{label}}text for labelling this as Pentagon jargon, similar to advanced situational awareness? --Lambiam 10:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC){{lb|en|US|_|military slang}}? – Jberkel 10:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)