Talk:laske
laske[edit]
- Discussion moved from User talk:Sgconlaw.
@Sgconlaw Have been rather busy, so had not got round to responding. The first time you reverted my edits on laske, it was mildly annoying, since just before that another administrator had taken the trouble to adjust or update the parameters contained therein; but the last time you reverted was totally logical and you set your reason clearly: I would not have returned my edits had I probed more deeply to find that lask with that meaning was already there; so my due apologies. I thought that since laske was the only spelling I had seen in Ogilvie's dictionary that this was the correct one and that it could be returned to the English vocabulary as an euphemism. Kind Regards. Andrew H. Gray 08:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC) Andrew
- @Werdna Yrneh Yarg: no problem! Yes, we already had a full entry at lask, so it made sense to regard laske as a variant spelling. — SGconlaw (talk) 08:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Rfv-sense: Obsolete veterinary term, 'to have diarrhoea'. DTLHS (talk) 16:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Resolved: I reverted the change, having already cleaned up the entry previously. Laske is a variant of lask; the relevant verb sense is already at the lemma and doesn’t need to be repeated. (@Werdna Yrneh Yarg: please note.) — SGconlaw (talk) 17:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)