Talk:no-smoking

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: April 2020–January 2021
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: April 2020–January 2021

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Seems SOP as "no" (sense 3) + "smoking." And by adding a hyphen, any such "no-[X]" construction can become an adjective — e.g. "no-soliciting sign," "no-food-or-drink zone," etc. Imetsia (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not really; I didn't realize these were even entries, although they do sound equally as SOP. Imetsia (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete this. @Donnanz:: non(-)smoking is not the same because it actually means "not smoking", e.g. a nonsmoking adult, whereas a "no-smoking sign" is named after the words on it, more like a "turn-left sign" etc. Equinox 02:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Equinox: Yes, I knew that. But I didn't realise this one is a new entry. DonnanZ (talk) 09:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm inclined to keep this, as I regard it as the correct form for no smoking as an attributive adjective, although many people wouldn't bother inserting a hyphen. And there are no-smoking signs every-bloody-where these days... DonnanZ (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
But isn't the consensus that we don't keep "attributive form" versions of words? (We even had a vote on it). In any event, the more basic question is whether no smoking should even be kept in the first place, since the SOP rationale provided in the request for deletion seems to apply just the same. Imetsia (talk) 14:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
By sense 3 of no, “Not any possibility or allowance of (doing something)”, no smoking is definitely SOP. No fighting, no drinking, no spitting, no gambling, no playing outside, no pleading your way out of it, no crying for mama.  --Lambiam 06:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete as SOP, IMO. ("No smoking" can at least be, and has been, argued to be a useful phrasebook entry.) - -sche (discuss) 06:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete. PUC20:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete as per the recent hyphenated attributive compounds vote. Khemehekis (talk) 03:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete given the consensus that we do not include hyphenated attributive adjectives of this sort. — SGconlaw (talk) 12:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:52, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply