Talk:pack a punch

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Also packs a real punch[edit]

Another similar idiom is packs a real punch.

That is just pack a punch + real I think. ---> Tooironic 08:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

"really packs a punch" would be a variation. 71.66.97.228 20:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also "packs"[edit]

packs a punch is also widely used. 71.66.97.228 07:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done. ---> Tooironic 08:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also packs a wallop[edit]

Another similar idiom: packs a wallop. 71.66.97.228 20:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Rfv-sense: "To throw a strong punch when fighting". I have added a sense: "To be capable of throwing a strong punch". I thought the two citations provided were fairly clear in supporting the capability aspect of the sense and not the instance aspect, but I've learned to be cautious about universalizing my personal judgments.

I have also added the "capability" aspect to the figurative sense. pack does not seem to frequently have this "capability" aspect with other objective complements (except wallop) (pack a wallop), but potentially has it with a variety of nouns such as "surprise", "reward", etc. DCDuring TALK 11:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

We lack throw a punch, which is the prototype for an idiomatic construction allowing various hyponyms of punch. DCDuring TALK 11:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Delete As the original page creator, I completely agree with the changes that have been made. Delete my first definition, and keep DCDuring's replacement. I also agree that the idiomatic "throw a punch" needs its own entry. Ackatsis 04:37, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sense removed, per Ackatsis. —RuakhTALK 14:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply