Talk:plurisexuality
Latest comment: 2 years ago by -sche
Are the two senses really distinct? Or is this just one sense? You could find (or construct) citations analogous to the one under sense 1 for bisexuality (multisexuality, etc). I am tentatively inclined to combine them in some way. @Suzukaze-c, WordyAndNerdy, Colin M, thoughts? - -sche (discuss) 00:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with merging them. Colin M (talk) 00:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'd say that these are technically two distinct senses as currently presented. The first is countable, the second is not. They could be merged into a single definition. There's a case to be made for either approach. WordyAndNerdy (talk) 02:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, that's a good point about countability. One one hand, other -sexuality words can also be either countable or uncountable (there's a book titled Representing Bisexualities, one titled Pacific Homosexualities, etc) and we don't currently seem to have separate senses for that, but on the other hand in those cases the words seem to be normally uncountable and only less frequently made countable as ~"a form or instance of __", while this word may(?) be more regularly countable. - -sche (discuss) 17:49, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'd say that these are technically two distinct senses as currently presented. The first is countable, the second is not. They could be merged into a single definition. There's a case to be made for either approach. WordyAndNerdy (talk) 02:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)