Talk:representamen

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Surjection in topic RFC discussion: October 2012–February 2021
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFC discussion: October 2012–February 2021[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


An encyclopedia article, IMO. DCDuring TALK 02:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

An encyclopedia article would be more concise. This is an article, the notes section and the bibliography from the back of the book, all dumped on the same page. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have moved the Latin material to [[repraesentamen]], which leaves the excessively long definition, which is solely based on the usage by Charles Sanders Peirce. We could use other citations, which seem abundant enough in the literature of semiotics to warrant Collins having a definition. I personally don't speak or read semiotics. DCDuring TALK 13:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Closed as stale. — surjection??22:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply