Talk:right man
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Jusjih in topic RFD discussion: November 2017–May 2018
Why is this page marked for deletion? — This unsigned comment was added by Btakita (talk • contribs).
- @Btakita: Hello. I can't give you an answer (not idiomatic? not enough quotations?), but the quotation is much too long, you have to cut it. Also, please don't forget to sign your messages with ~~~~. --Barytonesis (talk) 11:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- And see its entry at Wiktionary:Requests for deletion. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @SemperBlotto: @Barytonesis: Thank you. I created an entry for Right Man, which solves the title case, plural name, & a shortened quotation. Btakita (talk) 11:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
If it exists at all - bad caps, bad plural. SemperBlotto (talk) 10:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
keep. It does exist (see supporting cites), and with this capitalization. Kiwima (talk) 04:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- "If it exists at all" sounds like a matter for WT:RFVE. "bad plural" sounds like a matter for WT:RFC (bad plural created by template {{en-noun}}). "bad caps" sounds like a matter for WT:RFVE or WT:RFC. I can't see any RFD relevant argument (like SOP, or maybe non-standard SMS/chat/internet mis-capitalisation which could be a reason to delete non-capitalised English proper nouns). 84.161.6.246 04:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep if attested wth an idiomatic meaning, which it apparently is, although I can't make sense of it. - -sche (discuss) 23:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Kept. No consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)