Talk:spare

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Raunderhill in topic Clarifying verb sense
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Definitions[edit]

I may be wrong, but to me it looks as if the definitions are rather randomly mixed between the adjective, noun and verb sections. For example, under Adjective: "To use frugally or stintingly, as that which is scarce or valuable; to retain or keep unused; to save". Is that not a definition of a verb? "The man used the machine frugally". Replacing "to use" with "used" etc. would make more sense.

-- 85.30.174.70 08:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tea room discussion[edit]

Note: the below discussion was moved from the Wiktionary:Tea room.

There is a missing verb sense, but I'm not certain which etymology it belongs under (or if it's a third), "go spare"/"went spare" meaning go/went crazy, become/became very angry. "goes spare" does get some use in this meaning, but nowhere near as much as go/went. I'm not sure that it is used in the present tense though, as all the bgc hits (at leas the first 20) for "going spare" are for a completely different sense (e.g. "there's some bacon going spare if you want any"). Thryduulf 22:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's not a verb, but a modifier of some sort, IMHO probably an adjective. OTOH, if it's really only used with the verb (deprecated template usage) go, then it should be at go spare, not at spare. —RuakhTALK 23:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Could it be it is "went spur"? ie a sudden change of mood like a horse jabbed by a spur.

RFM discussion: November 2017–May 2018[edit]

See Talk:go spare#RFM discussion: November 2017–May 2018.

RFV discussion: July–August 2021[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: slow. Apparently there's a quote by Grose out there Queenofnortheast (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

More likely Francis Grose's dictionary of the Vulgar tongue. Kiwima (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
His provincial glossary actually, but it is only a mention Wubble You (talk) 12:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 22:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Clarifying verb sense[edit]

(1) Missing ditransitive verb sense of English 'spare' related to sense 3 -- e.g. "Can you spare John five dollars?" -- which (interestingly) seems to only sound fully natural when used in questions. I believe this is the sense represented as 9a of verb 1 'spare' in the OED. (2) the current entry obscures the fact that both etymologies of spare share a common source -- senses 2 and 3 of the verb make this most clear (e.g. sense 3 could be reframed as 'give away spare X'). This claim is supported by etymonline in their etymology for the adjectival form of 'spare' ("from the same root as spare v.") Raunderhill (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply