Talk:story

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Waldyrious in topic Unclear distinction between two of the senses
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFM discussion: April–October 2021[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


The building and floor senses are duplicated. Equinox 20:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

It seems this has since been fixed. (story is listed as an alternative spelling of storey.) - excarnateSojourner (talk|contrib) 07:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


storyplay[edit]

Storyplaying: Agency and Narrative in Video Games Backinstadiums (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unclear distinction between two of the senses[edit]

I'm a little puzzled by the relationship between sense 1:

A sequence of real or fictional events; or, an account of such a sequence. (synonym: tome)

...and sense 5:

A sequence of events, or a situation, such as might be related in an account. (synonym: narrative)

For context, the latter was added in 2011 by Ruakh, when the first meaning was narrower in meaning:

An account of real or fictional events.

Some time later (in 2012), the first meaning got expanded to be more specific, by Wikimanisan:

A sequence of real or fictional causal events. A Narrative would be an account of or the "telling" of a story.

But it was edited a few minutes after, again by Ruakh, to a phrasing almost identical to the current one:

A sequence of real or fictional causal events; or, an account of such a sequence.

(The "causal" got removed a while later by Equinox, yielding the current wording.)

Can someone help clarify the distinction between the two?

--Waldyrious (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for raising this. I clearly messed up — I should have reverted Wikimanisan's edit, since the "sequence of events" sense was already covered separately. Presumably I didn't remember that it was. —RuakhTALK 01:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Cool, thanks for confirming! I will make that change, then. Waldyrious (talk) 04:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply