Talk:vigor
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Backinstadiums in topic (U.S.) legal validity or force
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This entry is a sloppy variation on the entry vigor. If someone insists on having these unnecessary spelling variant entries, the least they can do is keep them synchronised.--Richardb 05:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Natural selection takes time! Someone obviously thought this important enough to enter, but if nobody nurtures it, it will eventually die. (It intrigues me though that this word, which is very suited to US spelling - to the point where vigourous is hardly used - is not succeeding. It is words like honor that grate with me, being so far removed from the French feel of the original (but perhaps I was just too into the Three Musketeers and the Scarlet Pimpernel when I was young; maybe I am unusual in thinking that honour was "originally" a French concept).
- Seriously though, even Wiktionary:Spelling variants in entry names accepts this will happen. Do we not have an automatic way to share content? --Enginear 15:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Translation sharing is the proposal, not entire content. --Connel MacKenzie T C 16:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Still high on my todo list. A little patience please. (Or someone else take a start with it?) — Vildricianus 16:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Checked vigour also, and I can't find the tag or anything untidy, so struck. DAVilla 15:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
(U.S.) legal validity or force[edit]
(U.S.) legal validity or force --Backinstadiums (talk) 12:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)