Talk:zmūni

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 months ago by 2003:DE:3730:F428:A061:1BF8:AC91:9DAB in topic RFV discussion: October 2021–February 2024
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: October 2021–February 2024[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Prussian. Nesselmann's Thesaurus linguae prussicae has: "smûni, Person, Ench. 62: niaina endirisna steison smûni, kein Ansehen der Person, wo smûni wohl Drckf. für smûnin, Accusativform hinter dem Gen. des Pronomens steison, ist [...]". --Myrelia (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mažiulis also has smūni, no mention of a form with a Z other than normalized/reconstructed forms. 70.175.192.217 02:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Normalized ≠ reconstructed. You just quoted the word. But the page should continue to be and bear {{normalized}}, perhaps soft-redirecting to the manuscript form, so people find something in the dictionary when searching either. Fay Freak (talk) 19:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Except there's no unique normalization of Old Prussian. Every author has their own system and orthography (e.g., the related word smoy has various normalized forms: "zmōi", "zmōi̯", "zmūi" ([1]). abasus has variously "abazs", "abazzus" ([2]). And so on.
The fact remains that there is no form of this word starting with 'z' that ever appeared in a manuscript. Should every normalized form that any linguist has written be considered valid? To be honest, I personally wouldn't mind listing normalized forms somehow, or reconstructions even (in the case where e.g. the nominative is not attested), as long as it was handled in a clear and consistent manner, but the current situation is a real mess. 70.175.192.217 23:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
RfV failed. --2003:DE:3730:F428:A061:1BF8:AC91:9DAB 01:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply