Appendix talk:Proto-Mixtec roots
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: August–November 2020
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Is an appendix for this still useful once all the roots have their own entries? --Lvovmauro (talk) 07:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't see these appendices as holding pens, but rather useful just by being a list of entries with definitions. We used to do this with indices, but the Index project kind of fell off a cliff. This being the English Wiktionary, however, it would certainly be improved by the inclusion of a column for the English translation. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 16:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Appendices are useful as indices and also contain essential metadata, such as the original order and layout of the glosses. Abacaxeiro (talk) 16:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)