Category talk:Form of templates

untitled

For consistency, these templates should call {{form of}}. How? — Vildricianus 14:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

No longer applicable. DAVilla 20:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Output change

Current	Proposed
Plural of word. Reflexive of word. Feminine of word. Et cetera.	Plural form of word. Reflexive form of word. Feminine form of word. Et cetera.

I propose changing the output of these templates to include the word "form", where needed, to improve clarity. – Quoth 08:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

FYI, you'd get more feedback posting this proposal to WT:BP. Rod (A. Smith) 02:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I've created the discussion. – Quoth 06:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I've created the template {{form}} which can be adjusted with css to turn off this difference, for those who prefer it. DAVilla 05:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

RFM

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Category:Form of templates

To Category:Form-of templates. I don't see why Category:Form-of templates by language has a hyphen and this doesn't. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I agree, I was going to suggest this myself. But I've been kind of trying to sort out and clean up that category anyway, and one thing I would like to do is to create subcategories for the different types of template. In particular, there would be a category for inflectional form-of templates like {{feminine of}} and another for alternative forms, spellings and such. —CodeCat 13:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I've created the new category and moved the page contents over, but the templates themselves will need to be fixed by hand. —CodeCat 22:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done —CodeCat 23:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

As a copy-editing pedant, I’d like to say that you are all awesome. —Michael Z. 2013-05-22 02:39 z