Citations:technosalvation

English citations of technosalvation

• 2011, Robert Gifford, The Dragons of Inaction, American Psychologist 66(4):290-302:

  Social comparison probably is related to social risk. Mistrust must often underlie denial. Technosalvation might well presuppose perceived program inadequacy.

• 2012, James W. Haag, Gregory R. Peterson, Michael L. Spezio, The Routledge Companion to Religion and Science, Routledge (→ISBN), page 579:

  First disseminated through science fiction, these promises of transhumanist technosalvation have become the principal public narratives surrounding brain-machine interfaces.

• 2018, Susan Clayton, Christie Manning, Psychology and Climate Change, Academic Press (→ISBN), page 173:

  In terms of the barriers taxonomy initially presented by Gifford (2011), this category encompasses mistrust, denial, reactance, technosalvation, suprahuman control, lack of self-efficacy, system justification, optimism bias, and confirmation bias.

• 2019, Elina Närvänen, Nina Mesiranta, Malla Mattila, Anna Heikkinen, Food Waste Management: Solving the Wicked Problem, Springer Nature (→ISBN), page 194:

  The reliance upon “technosalvation” is a form of cognitive dissonance, allowing us to continue with the status quo while avoiding personal responsibility (Gifford 2011; Lorenzoni et al. 2007).