Reconstruction talk:Proto-Japonic/na

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Eirikr in topic "name" derivatives
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Old Japanese na ... se "not"[edit]

@Eirikr Reading the Man'yoshu, I do note of a standalone "na" being used before a verb, but paired with the verb se "to do". This is one very important evidence that I must consider, as this construction is unknown in Modern Japanese. For Ryukyuan, the Okinawan form neen, Miyako nyaan, and Yaeyama neenu (cognate with Japanese nai) were formed from a Proto-Ryukyuan base, although I don't know if it comes from an original phrase with *na. Cheers! Kwékwlos (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Kwékwlos -- Ya, the usage of prohibitionary な in OJP included different grammatical structures that we don't see anymore. If you can read Japanese, the entry in the KDJ is quite extensive. The first な listing on that page is for OJP usage, where the な was followed by the verb in various constructions, with quotes from the Man'yōshū of 759. We also see prohibitionary な after the verb in the terminal / conclusive form, further down the page under the third な heading, sense [3] 〘終助〙, subsense [三], with quotes from the Nihon Shoki from 720 and The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter from the 900s.
I likewise suspect that the Okinawan neen is cognate with ない. See the entry in the Shuri-Naha Dialect Dictionary, which suggests a similar derivation. This indicates that the adjectival / stative-verb form was probably already extant prior to Ryukyuan and mainland OJP branching off. The prohibitionary な that comes after the verb also seems to be part of the Okinawan verb-conjugation paradigm, as shown here in the JA WP article on Okinawan. So I believe the prohibitionary な and adjectival / stative-verb ねーん were probably distinct even at the Proto stage. Cheers, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 00:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

"name" derivatives[edit]

@Chuterix, you recently changed the derivative jpx-pro form from namuy to namn. I have not encountered any reconstruction of anything Japonic that allows this kind of /mn/ consonant cluster. Could you explain? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 04:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply