Talk:İzmir

RFV

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

I doubt this would be the main spelling in English. Relative usage? DCDuring TALK 22:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Also, I don't see that most of the attributes of the encyclopedic definition are confirmed in the single citation. DCDuring TALK 23:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Swap content with Izmir. Dorem is pushing his pedantic agenda again. --Vahag 20:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

It's hardly my "pedantic agenda"; note that Wikipedia has its article at the dotted spelling. Good luck discovering relative usages when Google fails to distinguish the dotted and dotless (deprecated template usage) Is. For the point about "most of the attributes of the…definition [being un]confirmed in the single citation", see Talk:adolescentilism#Request for verification. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 19:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Besides all that, it has been long established that we don't necessarily lemmatise the most common spelling of a word, but rather leave it up to the editor who creates the entry or section is question (see, for example, User talk:Doremítzwr#homœophony: point 3 of my post timestamped 16:26, 13 April 2010). — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 17:55, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Now tri-cited for good measure. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Cited, and therefore passed: both this spelling and Izmir exist. Feel free to switch which of the two pages, this one and Izmir, is the main page, though. - -sche (discuss) 21:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)