Talk:別
Glyph origin appears to be from 冎 rather than 骨. What is the source on glyph origin?
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Japanese. Rfv-sense:
===Adverb===
{{ja-pos|べつ|adverb}}
# not [[particularly]]; not [[specially]] (used with a negative verb)
====Derived terms====
* {{ja-r|別に|べつ に}}
Added in this edit. Is this just referring to 別に? —Fish bowl (talk) 00:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm, I think that must be in reference to 別に (betsu ni). The term 別 (betsu) on its own is not used adverbially this way, so far as I'm aware. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 01:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
No confirmation in the past several months. I have removed the mistaken POS and sense. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 01:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)