Talk:奴隸制度

RFD discussion: October 2017–June 2018

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

奴隸制度

奴隶制度

If it doesn't pass the lemming test, I think this is an SoP in Chinese: 奴隸／奴隶 (núlì, “slave”) + 制度 (zhìdù, “system”). --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 09:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

FWIW, MDBG has it for ZH, and Daijirin has the corresponding 奴隷制度 spelling for JA. (Shogakukan also has it, but that's dead-tree and not linkable.) ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 22:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

PS: 奴隸制度 would be the 旧字体 (kyūjitai) or pre-reform spelling for JA as well. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 22:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

@Eirikr: Thanks for the response and the links. So, lemming test is passed but is there another argument for keeping the entry/entries? An English word for "slavery" exists, what's the Chinese for for it? The word is likely to be looked up? We need to have separate CFI for languages such as Chinese and Japanese where word boundaries are not clear. Please note that the Korean and the Vietnamese cognates 노예 제도 (noye jedo) and chế độ nô lệ are not necessarily considered single words (the word order in Vietnamese is reversed). --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 12:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

• I'm ambivalent about this, but if we do delete, could someone please add the term as an example collocation. ---> Tooironic (talk) 14:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Kept. No consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 04:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)