Talk:瑅瑭

RFV discussion: February–June 2022

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

瑅瑭

Chinese. Is this attested outside 集韻? RcAlex36 (talk) 09:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@RcAlex36: I don't think so, but technically 集韻 is enough for verification since this is not Standard Written Chinese. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 06:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

• RFV passed. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 00:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)