Talk:璩

RFV discussion: February–November 2021

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

璩

Rfv-sense: "ring/earring-like jade wares". Tagged by @Geographyinitiative but not listed. RcAlex36 (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

像環的玉器。[1] --Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

@Geographyinitiative: Did you have a reason for RFV-ing this? You added this definition but tagged it with RFV in the same edit. It doesn't seem like there are uses for this sense, though many dictionaries include this, with 鐻 being the more commonly attested variant. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 00:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

My original understanding of the concept of RFV was not as an entry-deletion vehicle for words without three cites, but instead as an actual "request" that some quotes could be added that would "verify" the definition on some level. I just wanted some quotes. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

@Geographyinitiative: Using {{rfquote}} would've been better for that. Anyhow, I'm not sure I am able to find any quotes for this definition. We could technically say that it's not part of "Standard Written Chinese" and just use dictionaries to end this request. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 00:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

As you deem appropriate --Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

• RFV passed. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 21:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)