Talk:

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Justinrleung in topic RFV discussion: September 2020–March 2021
Jump to navigation Jump to search

[edit]

@The dog2 Do you have a source for this? — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 03:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Justinrleung: Yes. Here it is: [1]. The dog2 (talk) 03:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
@The dog2: Hmm, I don't know if we should take videos like this as a reliable source. I'll rfv it then. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 03:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: September 2020–March 2021[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: variant form of 徛 (probably just the "stand" sense). See Talk:跂. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 03:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the video on that talk page refers to the "stand" sense. The dog2 (talk) 04:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
I don't think that video should be taken as a source for how things are written, though. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 05:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Here's other instances of it being written that way: [2] and here. The dog2 (talk) 16:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
@The dog2: The second source looks like it's describing our pronunciation 2 (alternative form of 企 “to stand on tiptoe”). I think this is where all these claims that kei5 should be written as 跂 began. I think we are still lacking a published source that somehow suggests this to be the way it can be written for the colloquial word in Cantonese, though. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 16:50, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply