Talk:釦

Is 扣 really only a variant here? I feel like if anything it should be the other way around ("釦分" seems weird) —suzukaze (t・c) 04:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

@suzukaze-c There's a difference between 釦 and 扣 in traditional Chinese. AFAIK, the last three definitions that User:Atitarev put shouldn't be here. 釦分 is definitely wrong. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 06:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

@suzukaze-c, Justinrleung, Wyang I may have stuffed this up. Please fix as you see fit. My source for the change was Pleco dictionary. Please also check 門釦, 門扣, 门扣--Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 06:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)