Talk:𢦂

RFV discussion: November 2017–January 2018

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

𢦂

Rfv for Cantonese. Dokurrat (talk) 03:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

@Dokurrat: "The Representation of Cantonese with Chinese Characters" cites 簡明粵英詞典, noting, "The author has created a number of Cantonese characters". — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 05:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

@Justinrleung: So it has passed rfv? Dokurrat (talk) 05:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

@Dokurrat: Not really... see WT:ATTEST. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 05:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Which is to say that I replaced the definition in the Translingual section with {rfdef|lang=mul}, not sure what to do about these characters.__Gamren (talk) 20:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ —suzukaze (t・c) 05:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Wyang, can you shed any light on if this character is used, and if so, what it means? - -sche (discuss) 14:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

@-sche :/ Not much luck unfortunately. I only found this in Từ điển Viện Hán Nôm, as a Nôm character for Vietnamese lờn. It seems the character was definitely used in history, but I'm not sure where else it has been used. Wyang (talk) 15:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)