Talk:American longhair

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: May–June 2014
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: May–June 2014[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


  • This is a matter for WT:RFV, I think. Per the little blurbs at the top of this page (and that one), RFD is for "Requests for deletion of pages in the main namespace due to policy violations" (including lack of idiomaticity), while RFV is for "Requests for verification in the form of durably-archived attestations conveying the meaning of the term in question." - -sche (discuss) 21:50, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • I thought this was a synonym for hippie. bd2412 T 21:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
@WritersCramp you're challenging idiomaticity right? You're saying it's merely a longhair which is American. BTW I checked for attestation before creating it, and it is attestable. But most of the hits are for a different sense as BD2412 points out. But of course, you only need three citations! Renard Migrant (talk) 12:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Not all longhair cats living in the United States are of the American longhair variety, some American longhair cats live outside the United States, American longhair says nothing about what kind of critter it is, and Wiktionary:COALMINE, so not SOP. Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 15:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
COALMINE only applies to single-word spellings (i.e. "Americanlonghair"). Equinox 15:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Rest of my points still stand, and the last point can (and has) been used to create a cat definition for longhair that passes muster Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 13:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Though the nominator isn't alleging sum of part, he or she is alleging 'this doesn't exist'. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
To continue with the pointless argument (pointless because we're all agreeing) it's like a blue whale. Not all whales that are blue and blue whales! Renard Migrant (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Keep per -sche. Request verification if necessary. — Ungoliant (falai) 00:51, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply