Talk:Armenglish

Wiktionary:Requests for verification discussion

From Armenglish at Wiktionary:Requests for verification:

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Armenglish

I can find one Usenet citation that I've added to Citations:Armenglish. That does seem to be it; nothing in books. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

It is apparently neologism, I don't think we can find citations in books. --Vacio (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Btw, can we use quotes from Twitter? --Vacio (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

AFAICT, no. Twitter is not durably archived. See WT:CFI for our criteria for inclusion. I don't think this word is citable. --Vahag (talk) 18:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Okay then, let's delete it. --Vacio (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

RFV failed --Vahag (talk) 19:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

You can't fail something that fast. --WikiTiki89 20:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

I know, but the creator of the entry agreed. We can pretend that I speedy-deleted the entry. --Vahag (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Then we can consider it mistakenly created, but not RFV failed. Deleted as "created in error". --WikiTiki89 20:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Also note one cite on the citations page. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 01:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)