Talk:Wavoid
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic Wavoid
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Please revisit this word. I believe it has been verified. Thanks. -- HowardBGolden 18:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Procedural comment. This was RFVed back in August of 2007; this is the last edit I see to that section in the history of this page, but, obviously, some later edit I'm not seeing deleted that section.—msh210℠ 20:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- The quote from The New Republic, while perhaps a good quote from their paper version, is a dead link to their Web site. Can anyone confirm it in print, and ascertain that the meaning intended is the same as our sense? The other quotes are several from the same author, and one from the Boston Globe's Web site (and, perhaps, newspaper); these seem good to me. So if the one from The New Republic is good, this is cited, imho. (And no, Ruakh, that's not a bleached conditional.)—msh210℠ 20:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- FWIW, here is a copy of the article I found using Google. Perhaps this will save someone a trip(pi?) to the library. — HowardBGolden 01:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
RFV passed. Thanks for the cites, HowardBGolden! —RuakhTALK 01:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)