Talk:acccessorially
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Widsith in topic Request for verification
Request for verification[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
When the top hit is Wiktionary, you know you're in trouble. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 13:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that it's a typo might have something to do with it. Note the triple c. :P —CodeCat 13:36, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Renamed per nomination to accessorially. Do we still want to RFV that? Mglovesfun (talk) 13:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ha, well spotted, I was happily adding cites there. I think the two-C form seems to be OK. Ƿidsiþ 13:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, I did not even notice that there were three c's. No wonder there weren't many hits. Widsith has added some good quotes and the rare tag, so I'm quite happy. Sheepishly striking. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί