Talk:bataculo
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: June–July 2021
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
If *badaculō is attested, which looks to be just a ghost word in that attestation given, *badaculō should be moved, not duplicated and deleted. I've also never heard of a "-clō frequentative suffix". --{{victar|talk}} 03:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Victar: Please see my reply in the user talk - I'm going to do as you suggest as soon as it's deleted. I'm not sure on what basis a Late Latin gloss clearly underlying a Romance etymon can be called a ghost word. The -clō frequentative suffix is a verbalization of the diminutive suffix -clus. There is no such diminutive noun attested - the only attested noun is bataclatio - so it would be unjustified to posit it. Romance does have it, but it might as well be deverbal there. Brutal Russian (talk) 22:07, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Already resolved elsewhere. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 00:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)