Talk:boomer remover

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by PUC in topic RFD discussion: March–June 2020
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: March–June 2020[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Why was this deleted as a creative protologism? It's clearly in use, clearly in the mass media. And it was referenced to news articles, from the New York Post and Newsweek. -- 67.70.32.186 04:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Financial Times [1]
  • The Inquirer [2]
  • Newsweek [3]
  • New York Post [4]
Those all seem to be mentions, not uses. —Mahāgaja · talk 06:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
The uses are on social media that Millennials use (as mentioned in the news articles). Thus this is an internet-used word. Like Reddit [5][6] or Twitter ; The news articles prove the term exists, and shows that it has entered the notice of the social consciousness of the world at large. -- 67.70.32.186 00:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Only one of the three links you provide there is a use, one is a mention and one is a hashtag term. While this may indeed be entering the lexicon, I don't think there is any need to get out ahead of it before it is established in some meaningful way, that is what UrbanDictionary is for. - TheDaveRoss 16:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not a question for RFD. Feel free to move this to RFV. PUC10:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply