Talk:butt chin

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

butt chin

Just a butt that looks like a chinLucifer 22:52, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Nope, a chin that looks like a butt. --Hekaheka 17:36, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Lol actually it's a cleft chin. Try reading the definition. — [Ric Laurent] — 23:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Also, lol @ a butt that looks like a chin. — [Ric Laurent] — 23:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

That is just a claim made in the definition, these two words means someone with a fat round chin like a butt, not cleft chin. Creator provides no proof of cleft chin claim.Lucifer 23:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

If you dispute what it means, you should use RFV (request for verification, where you're asking people to find citations). RFD is where you think it doesn't even meet the criteria for inclusion somehow. Personally I've never heard of a "butt chin"! Equinox ◑ 00:01, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Just added three cites. Bout to add a wikipedia link (cleft chin) which clearly lists it as a synonym. Stop being bitter that I'm nominating your bad entries for deletion lol — [Ric Laurent] — 00:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

I don't think its meets CFI, the definition given is made up, and the definition I understand these words to mean, are SOP, either way delete.Lucifer 00:04, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

You don't understand the CFI lol. The definition very clearly isn't made up, read the cites and the wikipedia page. I'm striking this now. — [Ric Laurent] — 00:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

I still contest this, and only two cites mention anything of a cleft chin, and only one fully supports that a butt and a cleft chin are one in the same, the other simply says someone with a cleft chin has people sometimes call it a cleft chin.Lucifer 00:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

There is not wikipedia article about butt chin, just a cleft chin. Wikipedia has one single source for butt chin=cleft chin, and that doesn't mean it meets CFI, nor does it mean that the reference is valid over there either.Lucifer 00:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

It has valid citations. This isn't even a valid RFD because it's an RFV issue. God. Equinox ◑ 00:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

I'd really love to ban him again. — [Ric Laurent] — 00:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't have three that clearly state it is what the creator claims it is. Out of the two that even mention cleft chin, one of them is dubious.Lucifer 00:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Lol, dubious? You don't get to decide that. I got all the cites from google books. And just to prove that you're a moron, I'll sit here and look for more than specify the cleft chin specifically. If you don't stop acting foolishly, I'm going to ban you again. — [Ric Laurent] — 00:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

There are now 9 quotes spanning 16 years. Two of them specifically say "cleft chin", 2 others mention a cleft, 3 mention a dimple, and 2 more a crack. I'm striking this again, and Troy, you can just get over it and look for something else to try and get deleted. — [Ric Laurent] — 01:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Keep, a butt chin is not a chin that can pass feces! --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Re-tagged, no reason not to give this seven days, others may want to express an opinion. --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, the reason would be that it was procedurally wrong to begin with. What Troy was contesting was the definition I gave, so it should have been at RFV, which Equinox correctly pointed out earlier. But whatever lol. I need to add a picture... — [Ric Laurent] — 12:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

First thing he says on this page is "Just a butt that looks like a chin" which looks like a SoP argument to me. Anyway, given the circumstances let's be procedurally correct on this one, eh? A week won't hurt anyone. --Mglovesfun (talk) 14:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Read it again. A BUTT that looks like a CHIN is not what the entry says, and a chin that looks like a butt (which is also not what the entry says, though I suppose I should make an etymological note of this) is not an accurate definition. (For one thing, a butt chin doesn't look like a butt. Except maybe in cartoons.) It's an informal term for a cleft chin, which is a pretty specific genetic trait. What causes it is a little groove in the jaw bone, not in the flesh of the chin itself. In no way is it SOP. :P

A week might not hurt anyone, but leaving this open is a waste of time, and besides, you can't be procedurally correct on something that was incorrectly placed to begin with. — [Ric Laurent] — 14:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

He's pointing out that the "moron" stated an SOP argument, and SOP arguments are grounds for deletion not verification. I am saying this is SOP, while also mentioning that even though the entry claims this means something else I am not convinced it is anything but the SOP chink looking like a butt, if that makes sense. And you can't block people for voicing their opinion on a deletion debate. Your not above the rules just because you want to be. I honestly didn't think the entry was valid at the time and the quotations didn't show it when you first added them, I am a bit more inclined to believe it now.Lucifer 21:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

For once, I vote for keep. I'd say it's quite hard to guess from the parts. --Hekaheka 08:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Kept, duh — [Ric Laurent] — 16:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)