Talk:cluichigidir

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 7 years ago by I'm so meta even this acronym in topic RFM discussion: September 2016–March 2017
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFM discussion: September 2016–March 2017[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This seems to be the actually attested form, as given by DIL and our own inflection table. Also, @Angr is the imperfect form in the table of Old Irish date? —CodeCat 22:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cluichigidir is the lemma form; we usually create entries under the lemma form even when it doesn't happen to be attested, don't we? I'm pretty sure that's what we do for Gothic, for example. As for the imperfect form, I'm not sure, but nothing in that quote looks very late, and the word "ōcbothae" looks pretty archaic. This page says "The earliest stratum of [O'Mulconry's glossary] may date back to the second half of the 7th or first half of the 8th century", which is definitely Old Irish. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not moved, per OI lemmatisation practices. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 08:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

@CodeCat, Angr, Metaknowledge: Shouldn't cluichigedar get a {{form of}} entry regardless? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it could. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Angr: Is this OK (except for rel; I don't know what rel. means in the context of cluichigidir's conjugation table)? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
"Relative", just as the page you linked to says. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Angr: Sorry; I'd never heard of a relative verb form before. BTW, what does that dot preceding cluichigedar signify? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
This use-example should avoid future nescience. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, Old Irish (and to some extent Modern Irish) has separate verb forms used in relative clauses. The dot is the conventional way of indicating a conjunct or prototonic verb form. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 17:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Aɴɢʀ: Fascinating! Thanks for the explanations. Is there a reason we use the term “relative”, rather than “dependent” for these verb forms? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 18:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I don't think the term "dependent" is used for Old Irish at all. It's used for Modern Irish, but dependent forms are not necessarily the same as relative forms. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Aɴɢʀ: OK, thanks. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 08:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply