Talk:deprieve
Latest comment: 1 year ago by This, that and the other in topic RFV discussion: February–March 2023
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
it just looks like a tyop for deprive OpenForceage (talk) 10:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- The Webster template is factitious and to be ignored. I'll be glad to delete this after 30 days; I would speedy it if there weren't so many GBooks hits to sift through. This, that and the other (talk) 11:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Given the number of results, especially in older books, it makes some sense to define this directly as an archaic spelling of deprive (or "archaic or nonstandard"). I couldn't find any instances where it doesn't just mean deprive though after a relatively extensive search. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 12:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Added the archaic/nonstandard spelling sense to the entry with 3 citations. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 21:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- (I've accordingly converted the rfv to an rfv-sense.) - -sche (discuss) 00:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 23:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)