Talk:dustbowl
Latest comment: 5 years ago by BD2412 in topic RFD discussion: March–November 2018
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
“The central region of the United States during the 1930s.” and “The 1930s period.”
- I don’t think these are common nouns. Dust Bowl has both senses (and they are better written there). — Ungoliant (falai) 21:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. There's no need to have these, even as altform defs. PseudoSkull (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. There is a distinct difference between "a dustbowl" and "the dustbowl." Though it would be less ambiguous if capitalized as Dustbowl. Nicole Sharp (talk) 04:21, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- I suppose these should be sent to RFV to look for any usage where the lowercase form means one of those things specifically and can't just be taken as a use of the general sense. (If no such usage exists, delete.) - -sche (discuss) 19:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Conditional delete, as per -sche. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 00:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as an alt form if it can pass RfV. Purplebackpack89 15:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Should be kept as an alternative to dust bowl. The US one is not the only thing called that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- keep (at least "The central region of the United States during the 1930s"). In anticipation of sche's suggestion that these be sent to RFV, I did some digging, and have cited this. I am happy to delete "The 1930s period", but the cites I added support including the synonym of Dust Bowl, and clearly refer to "the" dustbowl, not just any dustbowl. Kiwima (talk) 21:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)