Talk:shapesmith

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 11 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: October–December 2012
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: October–December 2012[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This can be found in many dictionaries going back at least a century or two, but I can't find it anywhere else. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

It was featured on the British TV show QI just now (an hour ago, or so) and it was in Dr Johnson's dictionary. Of course we don't use the same rules as he used back then. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:19, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have cited the spelling shape-smith, but I don't know what definition fits the cites. See Citations:shapesmith. Those four pretty much exhausted the valid cites at Google Books. DCDuring TALK 23:33, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn't include the one from the Edda, since it seems like there are several calque-like literalish translations there. The other three seem to fit the definition in question, though. It's odd that the only cites are spelled differently than the dictionary entries.
I should mention that there was one other definition in Google Books referring to a type of craftsman, and the name of a computer application by that name. On Usenet it was all just the computer application and user names apparently associated with it. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I also just found this Chuck Entz (talk) 01:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
I could not find any spelling of shapesmith at that last link. DCDuring TALK 03:43, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
"This inclination to obesity has always been a heavy source of discomfort and annoyance to Mr Strumcerner and it is known that he has been in training under a multitude of shape-smiths to effect if possible a reduction of that fleshy knobbiness which so materially interferes with the symmetry of his form." Chuck Entz (talk) 04:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Excellent. I wonder why I couldn't see it. DCDuring TALK 04:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
And I agree with you about the Edda. I strongly suspected calque, but, given the scarcity, I kept it. DCDuring TALK 03:45, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
So, move it to the attested spelling? - -sche (discuss) 05:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
RFV-failed for now, since it is unclear which sense, if any, is attested. - -sche (discuss) 22:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply