Talk:washout

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Sgconlaw in topic Countability
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RfV discussion[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


washout[edit]

Verb without any inflected forms: "To wash something out."

There are many occurrences of "to washout". Most are nouns, including all before 1980. After 1980, I suspect that unsupervised spelling correction and not-too-sophisticated spelling correction has led to some substitution of washout for wash out. I personally wouldn't be convinced by anything other than instances of the inflected forms, but perhaps someone can produce other arguments and/or evidence. DCDuring TALK 23:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Like the ubiquitous "click here to login"; see also our dubious verb entry for strikethrough. I would prefer to see this gone, because I think most users would agree it was wrong if made to think about it, but I don't suppose that's a tenable reason here. Equinox 20:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 20:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


Countability[edit]

@Equinox: regarding this edit, which are the uncountable senses? Thanks. — Sgconlaw (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

There is at least one: the meteorology sense. Equinox 01:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Equinox: hmmm, I would have thought it is countable too: “The rainy days caused a washout of the haze particles.” — Sgconlaw (talk) 01:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Examples: "negligible washout" (no determiner present); "Washout coefficients were calculated as a function of the rainfall intensity". Equinox 01:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Equinox: I guess we need to find some quotations. Thanks. — Sgconlaw (talk) 01:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply