Talk:xerox copy
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Somerandomuser in topic RFD discussion: April 2014
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This seems entirely redundant to xerox. Equinox ◑ 14:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per WT:COALMINE. — Ungoliant (falai) 17:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Because of "xeroxcopy"? Wow, maybe someone has spelled it that way. Equinox ◑ 17:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- They have. — Ungoliant (falai) 17:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Because of "xeroxcopy"? Wow, maybe someone has spelled it that way. Equinox ◑ 17:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm, keep it. An extended form of xerox. I don't think we use this term in the UK. Donnanz (talk) 23:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete —Michael Z. 2014-04-10 00:33 z
Definitely Keep. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Kept per WT:CM. xeroxcopy should probably be cited. DAVilla 20:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I agree that this should be kept, because I know it is commonly used in some countries. Somerandomuser (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)